On Wednesday 2016-10-12 11:22 -0400, Chris Hutten-Czapski wrote: > Can you provide any details (either inline, or a sampling of links) to > summarize the broader concerns that might not be encapsulated in the > document itself?
Some links: https://annevankesteren.nl/2016/01/film-at-11 https://github.com/w3c/html/issues/507 -David > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:46 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > > A W3C Proposed Recommendation is available for the membership of W3C > > (including Mozilla) to vote on, before it proceeds to the final > > stage of being a W3C Recomendation: > > > > HTML 5.1 > > W3C TR draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/html/ > > W3C Editor's draft: https://w3c.github.io/html/ > > deadline: Thursday, October 13, 2016 > > > > If there are comments you think Mozilla should send as part of the > > review, please say so in this thread. (I'd note, however, that > > there have been many previous opportunities to make comments, so > > it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues for the first > > time at this stage.) > > > > Note that this specification is somewhat controversial for various > > reasons, mainly related to the forking of the specification from the > > WHATWG copy, the quality of the work done on it since the fork, and > > some of the particular modifications that have been made since that > > fork. -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list email@example.com https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform