On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 12:43:58 UTC-5, Steve Fink wrote: > On 11/29/2017 08:35 AM, Mark Côté wrote: > > I posted an update on Phabricator and Lando to my blog a couple weeks ago, > > but I figured I should share it here too: > > https://mrcote.info/blog/2017/11/17/phabricator-and-lando-november-update/ > > > > There are two important points: > > > > 1. Our Phabricator instance has been up and running for a few months now. > > Our team has been using it regularly, as has the NSS team and some Firefox > > devs. We were hesitant to advertise this too widely in order not to create > > any confusion around the Quantum release, but now that that has settled > > down I am told it should be fine for anyone to start using it. The > > instance is at https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/ and there are docs > > at https://moz-conduit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/phabricator-user.html. We > > will have some hands-on training in Austin as well. > > Where should we file bugs, and what sorts of bugs would be useful right now? > > I see in bugzilla Conduit :: Phabricator (Upstream) and Conduit :: > Phabricator Extensions. I don't know what Conduit is. I checked Conduit > :: General, but it just says "General Conduit bugs." What terminology do > we need to know in order to be able to file bugs and find the right > documentation? > > So for example, "recent commits" on the mozilla-central repo appears to > be backwards. It only shows stuff from 2007, and the related pages > (History, Graph) are the same. The Graph page, in particular, seems to > only allow advancing a page at a time, so there's no way you'd ever get > to the tip. But this is totally noncritical functionality right now, so > perhaps it would just add friction to file a bunch of obvious bugs?
"Conduit" is the name of the whole system consisting of all our services related to code review and landing (and a few other things). The "Getting in Touch" section of our docs has a breakdown of components: http://moz-conduit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/phabricator-user.html#getting-in-touch Huh yeah I didn't notice that about the history & graphs. That is weird. To be honest, Diffusion is not the best source-code viewer for a repo the size of mozilla-central. I would still default to using hg.mozilla.org, despite it not having as fancy an interface. But feel free to file those bugs as I am curious why the behaviour is the way it is. Those would belong in Conduit :: Phabricator (Upstream), as we do not intend to heavily customize our instance and hence would like to work with upstream on these kinds of issues. Mark _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
