The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: Second Screen Working Group https://w3c.github.io/secondscreen-charter/ https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2017Dec/0000.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through Friday, January 52. (Sorry for failing to send this out sooner!) A diff relative to the current charter is: https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2014%2Fsecondscreen%2Fcharter-2016.html&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fsecondscreen-charter%2F The participants in the working group are: https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=74168&public=1&order=org Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should support or oppose it. One longstanding concern for me with this work is to what extent it defines an API that lets an Google-made browser talk to a Google screen, and an Apple-made browser talk to an Apple screen, versus to what extent it allows any browser to talk to any screen that supports a particular piece of technology. I think there might have been some encouraging news on this front at TPAC in November, but I don't remember the details. But if there was, I'd rather expect it to be incorporated into this charter, but I don't really see that after a first read. I'm curious what others know and think about this issue. -David -- π L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ π π’ Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ π Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
