I also have a few comments on the draft APA charter at https://www.w3.org/2018/03/draft-apa-charter now that I've had a chance to review it.
I think we should suggest that both: * the first toplevel bullet point in the scope section * the second bullet point in the success criteria section be more explicitly open about working with non-W3C groups, since I think there may be productive opportunities for such interaction, such as with the WHATWG. This is also the first time I'm seeing the work on Personalization Semantics. I wonder whether it's a good idea for this work to have its naming such that it's essentially limited to accessibility, since many of the semantics being defined seem more generally useful for cases beyond accessibility (e.g., they'd be very helpful for autofill). I wonder if they should be more general additions to the markup languages being extended rather than accessibility-specific attributes (at least based on what I think the naming is suggesting). I'm curious what others think about this, particularly the latter point. -David -- š¯„˛ L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ š¯„‚ š¯„¢ Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ š¯„‚ Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
