Most of the deltas range from editorial to general good hygiene. The
only changes of any real consequence that I see are:
* Updating their previous work to new versions
* Charter item to work on a profile of TTML2 to support audio-only use
cases
* Catch-all clause at the bottom of ยง2.1 that grants the WG carte
blanche to work on any random thing they want
Having little background in this technology, I'm pretty ambivalent about
the first two changes. I think we should object to the third change:
charters serve both the guide work and limit scope, and this clause
removes all scope limitations.
/a
On 8/28/19 5:41 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Timed Text (TT) Working Group
https://www.w3.org/2019/08/ttwg-proposed-charter.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Aug/0004.html
The comparison to the group's previous charter is:
https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2018%2F05%2Ftimed-text-charter.html&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2F08%2Fttwg-proposed-charter.html
Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
Tuesday, September 10.
Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should
say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.
-David
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
