Is this list documented somewhere? I searched for "privacy.query_stripping site:mozilla.org" and found only developer-centric links (Bugzilla issues, mailing list posts, commits, etc.)
Thanks, Daniel Serodio On Wednesday, June 29, 2022 at 3:33:26 AM UTC-3 xintrea wrote: > This is a very strange decision. It will be necessary to create a WEB > standard with a list of "forbidden" parameters, so that other projects that > might accidentally use the same parameter names do not suffer. > > This update may cause mega-corporations to generate parameter names. > Visually, they will look like a random set of characters, inside they will > contain an encrypted name with a random initialization vector and a > checksum to distinguish between friend or enemy. > > ?vdj1967enxb52p99kiGFskdj785hFyu=kjQGj90sac17E6AJjk8afzmScA > > Further you will forbid to use "unreadable" names of parameters? Then they > will begin to make up random names from readable words. Will you start > limiting the length of parameter names next? Then you will destroy the > entire Internet. > > среда, 13 октября 2021 г. в 19:59:53 UTC+3, [email protected]: > >> Hi folks, >> >> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 1:37 PM Chris H-C <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> To dveditz's points: >>> >>> > Are you tracking users, or campaigns? >>> >>> Me personally? Neither : ) But to my knowledge from helping with the >>> implementation of attribution collection in Firefox Telemetry the answer is >>> campaigns (and other things on that order)[1]. Basically `utm_` params. >>> >>> > do you track cross-site? >>> >>> Again, not me personally : ) But we may have partners driving us >>> traffic, and we may host the installer on non-first-party eTLD+1s for, I >>> dunno, CDN reasons? (not sure we do for Desktop, but we don't host our own >>> packages for Android and iOS as you'd imagine. App Stores. Ick.). >>> >>> > Are you likely to use fbclid= or other known tracker to do so? >>> >>> I doubt that very much. To my knowledge we're interested in >>> campaign/experiment/branch-level efficacy measurement, not user-level >>> tracking. >>> >> >> Many thanks to :chutten for raising this, 'cuz otherwise it would have >> been me. The attribution that we're talking about is not user-level, but >> we do use "well known" identifiers: from >> https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/b822a27de3947d3f4898defac6164e52caf1451b/browser/components/attribution/AttributionCode.jsm#45-54, >> >> I see: >> >> "source", >> "medium", >> "campaign", >> "content", >> "experiment", >> "variation", >> "ua", >> "dltoken", >> >> These are terms that Firefox's client-side attribution code recognizes >> It's possible that mozilla.org (bedrock) uses and/or recognizes more. I >> believe that the first several of those are "industry standard" terms and >> while not user-level generally (or at this time), might be blocked were we >> and others to block more aggressively. The "dltoken" is a per-download >> identifier. >> >> Nick >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-platform/498eca6e-f8f6-4a37-9b6e-e6b58e67c56fn%40mozilla.org.
