-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/05/2015 03:44 PM, Mike Perry wrote: > I am also in favor of standardizing the way that Firefox > communicates with Tor as a privacy-preserving network layer, so > that Mozilla is not locked in to Tor as the only way of providing > network privacy.
This is a double-plus good idea. I have pitched the idea for a network-only process that exposes an API via xpc/webidl. On Firefox OS we'd be able to use PID-based iptables rules to force all DNS/TCP traffic from the net process through Tor--or any proxy for that matter (e.g. VPN, etc). You could also look at as adding some security-by-isolation. - --dave -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU9JJnAAoJEJ7v31qiCP4gRX8P/0pKB12+Zii0O8YU3uuG+4VG ArdKIBP6cf9UFjiTIhKlfyLEvuaYGMWYUaEBWqmtXdaYgkmgSOB0tyqGlstGdVDA Z2jWAbr6Aw2vlJEwFPPc+04TvGTYPqVFAo3941KjDZs4eG5UDqVmOApDvktg3cMV 76eLqzVzvlYcThh+TCP61AgKjTh4+IwzccdRbFmhV3Qad9Mz6E6HWaWPub8KsEvl flzMRib5dsCcUdQh9418OWIBlJWocy9byuv6NY7o7clDH7KtL9hpqJeU0JNxzio6 XwxTQN5zsGfMKAn62vaJgrtZlnwX4AiSc1AjqczLVTFT1ToNJ1CAAgtLrjGYUQf7 6JcQ8/aEauw+5jEtIkcRWpuUedWaesEIuJ14rFFBWnpuEr/S/e+wYl+sXS1eqLuQ qlsnaVwJJ8TqqWBOTa1iHd8Mp6j6pc2qPXOH9JM1RD5xq8bjxoE5FIdp4ZoozNcp 9J5c7q9852flcxcAydJnaY8tuwbbjk/YtcmDg32+CVz9foz1K61J3KDcF27cYiW+ w2gJDjg+xm62MJ3zwrZwGpKp9IMeZAaJzaRP0ie93Z2dXHkc+I3YVsKEOHo0MB6H +/c/QQEd94D+wp20bdMmxp84aH7zBJlV4Fvhgn9gHYM04g0feBFnjlEZN+oCutP3 C305EZWNN3wJ6QaAhj0q =FXac -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
0x0CE81F9B.asc.sig
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dev-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-privacy
