On Wednesday, 11 January 2017 18:31:32 UTC, Ryan Sleevi  wrote:

> Because you're not required to setup the webserver for
> smtp.example.com.

Ah yes, silly me

> I'm not saying they'd be right in arguing so

I suppose that from a husbanding of resources point of view it makes sense to 
wait and see what happens to the remnants of ballot 169 before Mozilla jumps up 
and down about this.
dev-security-policy mailing list

Reply via email to