On 15/09/15 10:17, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 11/09/15 22:06, Rob Stradling wrote:
>> On 11/09/15 13:05, Gervase Markham wrote:
>>> On 08/09/15 10:54, Rob Stradling wrote:
>>>> Assuming this is still Mozilla's plan, please would you clarify which
>>>> versions of Firefox and Thunderbird will be (or were?) the first
>>>> versions that won't accept "normal CA-issued object-signing certificates" ?
>>>
>>> Extension signing was historically very rare, so I'm not sure what our
>>> new signing system would do when faced with an extension which is
>>> already signed. (Is that what you are asking?)
>>
>> Yes, that's what I'm asking.
> 
> I would ask Jorge Villalobos, perhaps in the group
> mozilla.addons.user-experience:
> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/forums/#addons-user-experience

Thanks Gerv.

I've posted a comment (currently awaiting moderation) here:
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/09/16/extending-the-deadline-for-add-on-signing/

(Not sure I can face joining Yet Another Newsgroup!)

-- 
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online

_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to