On 11/13/15 5:43 AM, Peter Kurrasch wrote:
Kathleen, is SECOM getting special treatment? I was wondering if there was some
reason to move forward before a CA has everything in order? Will we be seeing
more of this going forward?
I thought everything was in order, except perhaps there might be a few
more suggestions to updating their CPS that could be tracked in parallel
(i.e. not show stoppers). We have done that in the past, and Ryan had
sent me email saying that he might not be able to participate in the
inclusion review discussions for a while, so to go forward without him.
But as you can see in the bug I realized that was not quite the case
when I went to write the summary to recommend approval. So, in the bug I
clarified that SECOM needs to make further updates to their CP/CPS
before we can move forward.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1096205#c28
So, it was not intentional.
However, I would like to get the root inclusion/update discussions
moving forward again -- those discussions have stalled out.
Kathleen
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
