在 2016年9月27日星期二 UTC+8下午11:21:26,Hector Martin "marcan"写道:
> On 2016-09-27 23:21, Han Yuwei wrote:
> > 在 2016年9月27日星期二 UTC+8下午8:33:28,Gervase Markham写道:
> >> On 27/09/16 13:13, [email protected] wrote:
> >>> We must use Windows XP becuase some programs can only run on XP. We
> >>> have no money to get new programs and new Windows. Do you give $$$¥¥¥
> >>> to me??? You don't right? So please understand why we use XP.
> >>
> >> Windows XP SP3 supports SHA-256. And of course, you always have the
> >> option of Linux, which is a free modern operating system.
> >>
> >> Gerv
> > 
> > There are a lot of software whose company is already down running at 
> > factoies, critical public infrastructures even hospital. We can't take the 
> > risk to upgrade the operating system. But I am not supporting continous 
> > using of SHA1 certificates. Maybe you can understand this. :)
> 
> *Not* upgrading the operating system is a security risk. If you need to
> interact with certificates, your computer is networked. If your computer
> is networked, you absolutely cannot afford *not* to keep it up to date
> and using a supported operating system. Anything else is asking to get
> compromised, and then certificates are going to be the least of your
> worries.
> 
> The "install it once and don't touch it" mentality stops working the
> moment there's an Ethernet port with a cable connected to it. I would
> hope networked equipment at critical public infrastructure like a
> hospital is using a supported, updated operating system and software.
> 
> -- 
> Hector Martin "marcan" ([email protected])
> Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub

Yes, I totally agree with you.But some software can't work under newer system. 
Maybe we can find a solution towards this.
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to