+mdsp
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 05:56, ramirommu...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi Jonathan > You are right, we are going to look into this, taken into account that the > same serial number should be in the real certificate. > > Regards > > El jueves, 17 de agosto de 2017, 19:54:31 (UTC+2), Jonathan Rudenberg > escribió: >> >> >> > On Aug 17, 2017, at 07:19, ramirommunoz--- via dev-security-policy >> > <dev-secur...@lists.mozilla.org> wrote: >> > >> > https://crt.sh/?id=112929021&opt=cablint >> > is a precertificate. You can see the CT Precertificate Poison critical >> > extention. >> >> The serial number of this certificate should still be added to the relevant >> CRL, as it is not possible to prove the non-existance of a corresponding >> certificate without the CT Poison extension. >> >> Jonathan _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
