On Wed, Apr 11, 2018, at 15:27, Matthew Hardeman via dev-security-policy wrote: > It was injudicious of a CA to issue another certificate in this name for > this entity after the already well documented controversy. Did they just > not care that it would invite trouble or did they not know that it would > invite controversy and trouble because they didn't track it the first time > around?
What "trouble" is being invited? I don't see a problem. Everything is operating exactly as expected. GoDaddy did nothing wrong. _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list email@example.com https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy