On 5/1/20 9:48 AM, Corey Bonnell wrote:
Hi Kathleen,
Thank you for sending out this notification of the draft survey. I have briefly
reviewed and would like to ask what is the intent of Item 4 and the associated
sub-items? The Browser Alignment draft ballot is under discussion in the CAB
Forum, so the intent behind the shift of the location of discourse to the
Mozilla forum is unclear.
Thanks,
Corey
Hi Corey,
We do not intend to shift the location of the discourse.
The intent of Item 4 and the associated sub-items in our survey is to
help Mozilla with the specific questions/concerns that we have about the
ballot, so that we can use input from CAs in our program to recommend
changes to the draft. It is relatively easy to tack our questions about
this draft ballot onto our CA Communication/survey, and the results will
give us the data we are currently lacking.
Currently some of my concerns about the draft of the ballot have no data
behind them. While I think it is good to add many of those items in the
ballot to the BRs, I am concerned about the effective dates of
"immediately" or "Sept 1". I don't want to end up with a bunch of cert
revocations caused by effective dates that should have been changed
while the ballot was in draft form. I also don't want to see the entire
ballot fail just because we didn't have the data to reasonably update
the draft of the ballot.
Note: There are some items in the ballot that we (Mozilla) might request
be removed, but that input will be provided by Mozilla's CABF
representatives (Ben and Wayne) directly into the CABF discussion forum.
I will greatly appreciate your thoughts on how to better ask the
questions in item 4 of our survey, to clarify our intent, and be able to
get the data that we seek.
Thanks,
Kathleen
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
