Tyler Close wrote: > Given the serious problems with browser security, such as phishing and > XSS, I don't understand why the EV proposal is consuming any of > Mozilla's precious development resources or affecting any release > plans. Shouldn't the EV proposal be developing as just another addon, > like any other low-to-mid priority change? Why is it jumping straight > to consideration by Mozilla for inclusion in the mainline code?
Well Gerv publicly said other people's code didn't get into the mainline code because the researchers didn't help with fixing other bugs for 6 months, so Verisign and others on this forum must have supplied coders to help with bug fixes for 6 months... -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://e164.org - Because e164.arpa is a tax on VoIP "In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip." _______________________________________________ dev-security mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
