Proposal of wording for the definition of *equivalent* (was: The EV
draft states auditing by WebTrust or *equivalent*.)

Copied from the *Mozilla CA Certificate Policy (Version 1.0)* at
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/ca-certificates/policy.html
without permission.

*Proposal:*

   1. Equivalent means to provide attestation of their conformance to
      the stated verification requirements and other operational
      criteria by a competent independent party or parties with access
      to details of the CA's internal operations.
   2. By "competent party" we mean a person or other entity who is
      authorized to perform audits according to the stated criteria
      (e.g., by the organization responsible for the criteria or by a
      relevant government agency) /or/ for whom there is sufficient
      public information available to determine that the party is
      competent to judge the CA's conformance to the stated criteria. In
      the latter case the "public information" referred to should
      include information regarding the party's
          * knowledge of CA-related technical issues such as public key
            cryptography and related standards;
          * experience in performing security-related audits,
            evaluations, or risk analyses; /and/
          * honesty and objectivity.
   3. By "independent party" we mean a person or other entity who is not
      affiliated with the CA as an employee or director /and/ for whom
      at least one of the following statements is true:
          * the party is not financially compensated by the CA;
          * the nature and amount of the party's financial compensation
            by the CA is publicly disclosed; /or/
          * the party is bound by law, government regulation, and/or a
            professional code of ethics to render an honest and
            objective judgement regarding the CA.
   4. We reserve the right to designate our own representative(s) to act
      as the competent independent party or parties described above,
      should that prove to be necessary and appropriate.
   5. The burden is on the CA to prove that it has met the above
      requirements. However the CA may request a preliminary
      determination from us regarding the acceptability of the criteria
      and/or the competent independent party or parties by which it
      proposes to meet the requirements of this policy.



-- 
Regards
 
Signer:      Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd.
Phone:       +1.213.341.0390
_______________________________________________
dev-security mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security

Reply via email to