On 26/01/10 12:38 PM, Brad Hards wrote:
I wasn't sure whether it was even appropriate to "hijack" the mozilla static
analysis list for sixgill discussions. Obviously not so bad when we're working
on analyses for mozilla, but what about when it is more general (e.g. sixgill
internals or a new analysis technique) or when it has nothing to do with
mozilla (e.g. applying sixgill to $random_project).
Yet another list? Just private email? Thoughts?
I think it's fine to keep using the newsgroup for now. If sixgill takes
over the world, it can have its own list :-).
Rob
_______________________________________________
dev-static-analysis mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis
