On 2013-01-23 10:36 AM, Chris Cleeland wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Bruce Stephens
<[email protected]>wrote:
Chris Cleeland <[email protected]> writes:
No, you've not done anything wrong. Search open bugs in github; I've
been
working on it as I have time...which I don't have right now. But I've
tried to keep the bug that I filed up to date.
Ah, right. I had checked, but for some reason didn't check that issue
(issue 57).
If you have suggestions for a more evocative title, let me know.
Hmm, had the issue been that the clang plugin was emitting the wrong
data I might have been able to help usefully (I've played around with
the relevant clang APIs a bit), but from the looks of it the SQL query
is being constructed incorrectly.
Yes, it's the query. I've got some hacks that sort of work, but not 100%.
Ultimately I think some of the stuff in query.py will have to change, too,
but I'm not fully cognizant of what dragons might be there so I'm reluctant
to suggest a change specifically for turning back in. What I'm trying to
do is document the SQL queries that generate the correct data so that
hopefully a person who understands the dragons can guide me on refactoring
query.py content or even just do it since my python is, uh, not very good.
Perhaps you can share your work on your fork and see if Erik can help
finish it up?
Thanks!
Ehsan
_______________________________________________
dev-static-analysis mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-static-analysis
