On Monday 2006-05-01 09:05 +1200, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > L. David Baron wrote: > > To clarify this a little: inline reflow is fundamentally an operation > > on lists, not trees. (Inline frames, which are containers, just put two > > items in the list: one before their children and one after.) If we do > > this algorithm by walking the list, without recursion into methods, then > > we can split things more easily and just keep going without having to go > > out of the recursion and then back into it on the new continuation > > objects. > > This sounds like something that would be post 1.9 if we did it ... I > don't see a driving need to do it for 1.9.
That's fine, although I fear significant work on the current code may be somewhat painful. > Do you intend this method to eventually construct the same sort of > inline frame tree that we do today? Yes. -David -- L. David Baron <URL: http://dbaron.org/ > Technical Lead, Layout & CSS, Mozilla Corporation
pgp8HbElgDYT8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
