L. David Baron wrote: > On Monday 2006-05-01 09:05 +1200, Robert O'Callahan wrote: >> L. David Baron wrote: >>> To clarify this a little: inline reflow is fundamentally an operation >>> on lists, not trees. (Inline frames, which are containers, just put two >>> items in the list: one before their children and one after.) If we do >>> this algorithm by walking the list, without recursion into methods, then >>> we can split things more easily and just keep going without having to go >>> out of the recursion and then back into it on the new continuation >>> objects. >> This sounds like something that would be post 1.9 if we did it ... I >> don't see a driving need to do it for 1.9. > > That's fine, although I fear significant work on the current code may be > somewhat painful.
The redo stuff that I've already implemented and the stuff that I just proposed don't feel too painful to me. I think the main reason to do what you're proposing would be performance. Rob _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
