On Sunday 2013-07-21 17:18 +1200, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 4:16 PM, L. David Baron <[email protected]> wrote: > > > nsHTMLReflowState::availableHeight -> nsHTMLReflowState::distanceToBreak > > > > Maybe I'm captured, but availableHeight actually sounds better to me.
At least part of the problem is that availableHeight and availableWidth are totally different things, which isn't what it sounds like from the name. > > removing mozilla::css namespace and just having the things in it be > > in mozilla, in some cases with class names beginning with CSS. > > > > Sounds good. What about mozilla::layout? Hmmm. Not that much in it, but probably the same? At first glance, the things in it seem to have unique enough names to be in mozilla. (I don't know anything about the ipc stuff, though.) -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 _______________________________________________ dev-tech-layout mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
