i'm not really familiar with AIX that much to suggest any tools or interfaces for tracking the issue down. if you can reproduce it on Solaris i can suggest libumem there. there were bunch of similar issues fixed since 5.08 and that is why i suggest you upgrade instead of spending time tracking it down because we do not do any fixes against 5.08 anymore anyway.
Wayne wrote: > Anton, > Thanks for responding. However, do you have any further ideas on why a > ldap_x_free would fail? Or do you know of any way to try and track down the > failure? > It looks like the ldap_x_free is trying to free the memory pointer, which > may no longer exist? > Is there anything that you can think of which can help in diagnosing the > failure? > > shm_catch_segv(0xb, 0x0, 0x2ff1fed0), line 4831 in "SHM.c" > malloc_y.free_y(??, ??) at 0xd01fc008 > malloc_y.free_y_heap(??) at 0xd01fc420 > ldap_x_free(0x240aa0d8), line 796 in "open.c" > ldap_x_hostlist_statusfree(0x240a9ff8), line 752 in "open.c" > nsldapi_try_each_host(0x2436d8d8, 0x240a9f88, 0x185, 0x0, 0xf0b93a2c, > 0xf0b93a44, 0xf0b93a50, 0x0), line 691 in "os-ip.c" > nsldapi_connect_to_host(0x2436d8d8, 0x2436dd78, 0x240a9f88, 0x185, 0x0, > 0x240a9fdc), line 468 in "os-ip.c" > nsldapi_new_connection(0x2436d8d8, 0x2ff209c8, 0x1, 0x1, 0x0), line 414 in > "request.c" > > Thanks, > Wayne > > "Anton Bobrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> you should definitely try the latest version although be aware that >> building on AIX is not very smooth and you will probably have to >> hack your way around but it builds with the right effort. we have, >> now somewhat outdated AIX build here : >> ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/directory/c-sdk/releases/v6.0.2-contrib-bin/ >> but note that those AIX builds received very limited testing. >> >> Wayne wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I have an 32bit C application that is running on AIX 5.2-008, and >>> intermittently, the program gets a segmentation violation in the ldap >>> library layer. >>> >>> The ldap library that we are using is the 5.08 version. >> [...] >>> Have anyone seen this before? >>> Is this something that is better handled with a later version of the ldap >>> libraries? > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-tech-ldap mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-ldap _______________________________________________ dev-tech-ldap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-ldap
