A suggestion is - OWA for Open Web App. Brings out the main ideas behind b2g - Open, Web and Applications. OWA is also outlook web-access / outlook web-app ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outlook_Web_App ), so not sure if there are any copyrights around it. If so, something like MWA - Mozilla WebApp - keeps the Mozilla brand and thereby provides a direct identification to the user.
My 2 cents. Thank you On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Anant Narayanan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/16/12 11:51 AM, Andy McKay wrote: >> >> On 16/08/2012, at 11:40 AM, Matt Basta wrote: >>> >>> - Not a generic extension (.zip) >> >> >> But it is just a .zip file. I've always felt things like .xpi's didn't >> really do much, but add in a (admittedly small) layer of confusion between >> the file and its contents. > > > +1. I would really like to simply use .zip, not only because that's what > they are, but because we can also effectively punt on the standardization > question for a while. > > The only reason to use a custom extension is if we expect users to download > these files and double-click/tap to install them, but we don't support that > on any platform at the moment. > > -Anant > > _______________________________________________ > dev-webapps mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-webapps _______________________________________________ dev-webapps mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-webapps
