I agree that obfuscation doesn't protect assets. Everything on client side can 
be "compromised" and developers need to understand that and design accordingly. 

> All obfuscating code does is stop people being able to read the code for
> the apps they are already running and have paid for. And that's a great
> shame.


I'd love the idea that people would by apps to read their code, but I am not 
sure if that reflects current reality. I hope it's something that we can
promote in the Marketplace; like promoting open source apps.

---
Harald Kirschner | Mozillian Partner & Labs Craftsman | [email protected] 
(mailto:[email protected])


On Tuesday, March 5, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Gervase Markham wrote:

> On 05/03/13 17:25, Kumar McMillan wrote:
> > I think there is a valid use case in protecting source code when a
> > merchant is selling an app. If the app can't be protected, how can
> > you sell it? 
> > 
> 
> 
> What do you mean by "protect"? This is the DeCSS fallacy - encrypting or
> obfuscating something doesn't stop someone copying it. It' just as easy
> to make a copy of the string "FCv46vszgrf" as it is to make a copy of
> the string "Hello".
> 
> > And if you can't sell an app then you can't build a
> > business on offering something compelling to the user. This obviously
> > isn't the only business model for apps but it's one that the open web
> > should support better than it does today, IMO.
> > 
> 
> 
> The open web should support selling apps. And we have copyright laws
> (and licensing servers) which are designed, to varying degrees of
> effectiveness, to stop people copying paid apps without paying. But the
> best way to sell apps is to make it easier to pay for them than to
> pirate them. Mozilla should not join the list of companies attempting to
> make water run uphill by stopping the Internet from being the fabulously
> efficient machine for copying things that it is.
> 
> All obfuscating code does is stop people being able to read the code for
> the apps they are already running and have paid for. And that's a great
> shame.
> 
> Gerv
> _______________________________________________
> dev-webapps mailing list
> [email protected] (mailto:[email protected])
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-webapps
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
dev-webapps mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-webapps

Reply via email to