Here it is again. It got sent the last time. Does the e-mail list strip out attachments?
On Jan 3, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > I think you missed your attachment :) > > On 01/03/2013 07:31 PM, Kepner, Jeremy - 0553 - MITLL wrote: >> Attached is the log for a set for 3 ingests. The first hump is with 1 >> ingestor, the second hump is with 2 ingestors, and the third hump is with 3 >> ingestors. The 3 ingestor case starts oscillating about 21:40. I don't see >> any spikes in any of the fields. It would be nice if there was also a plot >> of Xceivers since I think that anti-correlates. I do sometimes see the hold >> times highlighted in red. The values are usually in hundreds of msec. >> >> On Jan 3, 2013, at 6:04 PM, John Vines wrote: >> >>> How many hard drives and what's your max minor/maor compactions set to? >>> These can severely limit your performance due to potential disk thrashing. >>> If you observe the monitor, when ingest starts trailing, do you see it >>> undergoing, or possibly being backed up on, any form of compaction? And >>> lastly, are you see the bug eric mentioned above? See if the monitor is >>> reporting any warnings like those mentioned.
