I think so, because I got it on the first Terry when I was directly listed Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity. On Jan 3, 2013 8:06 PM, "Kepner, Jeremy - 0553 - MITLL" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Here it is again. It got sent the last time. Does the e-mail list strip > out attachments? > > On Jan 3, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Josh Elser wrote: > > > I think you missed your attachment :) > > > > On 01/03/2013 07:31 PM, Kepner, Jeremy - 0553 - MITLL wrote: > >> Attached is the log for a set for 3 ingests. The first hump is with 1 > ingestor, the second hump is with 2 ingestors, and the third hump is with 3 > ingestors. The 3 ingestor case starts oscillating about 21:40. I don't see > any spikes in any of the fields. It would be nice if there was also a plot > of Xceivers since I think that anti-correlates. I do sometimes see the > hold times highlighted in red. The values are usually in hundreds of msec. > >> > >> On Jan 3, 2013, at 6:04 PM, John Vines wrote: > >> > >>> How many hard drives and what's your max minor/maor compactions set to? > >>> These can severely limit your performance due to potential disk > thrashing. > >>> If you observe the monitor, when ingest starts trailing, do you see it > >>> undergoing, or possibly being backed up on, any form of compaction? And > >>> lastly, are you see the bug eric mentioned above? See if the monitor is > >>> reporting any warnings like those mentioned. > >
