Vanilla. On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > Which version of 0.20 are you testing against? Vanilla, or cdh3 flavored? > > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Joey Echeverria <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't think that's a good idea unless you can come up with very >> clear version number change. >> >> -Joey >> >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Would it be reasonable to consider a version of 1.4 that breaks >> > compatibility with 0.20? I'm not really a fan of this, personally, but >> > am curious what others think. >> > >> > -- >> > Christopher L Tubbs II >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Joey Echeverria <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Sorry for the delay, it's been one of those weeks. >> >> >> >> The current version would probably not be backwards compatible to >> >> 0.20.2 just based on changes in dependencies. We're looking right now >> >> to see how hard it is to have three way compatibility (0.20, 1.0, >> >> 2.0). >> >> >> >> -Joey >> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Dave Marion <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Any update? >> >>> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: Joey Echeverria [mailto:[email protected]] >> >>> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 1:24 PM >> >>> To: [email protected] >> >>> Subject: Re: Hadoop 2.0 Support for Accumulo 1.4 Branch >> >>> >> >>> We're testing this today. I'll report back what we find. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -Joey >> >>> — >> >>> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:34 PM, null <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> "Will 1.4 still work with 0.20 with these patches?" >> >>>> Great point Billie. >> >>>> ----- Original Message ----- >> >>>> From: "Billie Rinaldi" <[email protected]> >> >>>> To: [email protected] >> >>>> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 3:02:41 PM >> >>>> Subject: Re: Hadoop 2.0 Support for Accumulo 1.4 Branch On Fri, Jul >> >>>> 26, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Joey Echeverria <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> > If these patches are going to be included with 1.4.4 or 1.4.5, I >> >>>>> > would >> >>>>> like >> >>>>> > to see the following test run using CDH4 on at least a 5 node >> cluster. >> >>>>> > More nodes would be better. >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > * unit test >> >>>>> > * Functional test >> >>>>> > * 24 hr Continuous ingest + verification >> >>>>> > * 24 hr Continuous ingest + verification + agitation >> >>>>> > * 24 hr Random walk >> >>>>> > * 24 hr Random walk + agitation >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > I may be able to assist with this, but I can not make any promises. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Sure thing. Is there already a write-up on running this full battery >> >>>>> of tests? I have a 10 node cluster that I can use for this. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > Great. I think this would be a good patch for 1.4. I assume that >> >>>>> > if a user stays with Hadoop 1 there are no dependency changes? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Yup. It works the same way as 1.5 where all of the dependency changes >> >>>>> are in a Hadoop 2.0 profile. >> >>>>> >> >>>> In 1.5.0, we gave up on compatibility with 0.20 (and early versions of >> >>>> 1.0) to make the compatibility requirements simpler; we ended up >> >>>> without dependency changes in the hadoop version profiles. Will 1.4 >> >>>> still work with 0.20 with these patches? If there are dependency >> >>>> changes in the profiles, 1.4 would have to be compiled against a >> >>>> hadoop version compatible with the running version of hadoop, correct? >> >>>> We had some trouble in the >> >>>> 1.5 release process with figuring out how to provide multiple binary >> >>>> artifacts (each compiled against a different version of hadoop) for >> >>>> the same release. Just something we should consider before we are in >> >>>> the midst of releasing 1.4.4. >> >>>> Billie >> >>>>> -Joey >> >>>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Joey Echeverria >> >> Director, Federal FTS >> >> Cloudera, Inc. >> >> >> >> -- >> Joey Echeverria >> Director, Federal FTS >> Cloudera, Inc. >>
-- Joey Echeverria Director, Federal FTS Cloudera, Inc.
