On Aug 2, 2013 2:22 PM, "Joey Echeverria" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Sorry for the delay, it's been one of those weeks. > > The current version would probably not be backwards compatible to > 0.20.2 just based on changes in dependencies. We're looking right now > to see how hard it is to have three way compatibility (0.20, 1.0, > 2.0).
It may not help much, but I believe the minimum dependency for 1.4 was bumped up to 0.20.205.0. Billie > > -Joey > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Dave Marion <[email protected]> wrote: > > Any update? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Joey Echeverria [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 1:24 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Hadoop 2.0 Support for Accumulo 1.4 Branch > > > > We're testing this today. I'll report back what we find. > > > > > > -Joey > > — > > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone > > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:34 PM, null <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> "Will 1.4 still work with 0.20 with these patches?" > >> Great point Billie. > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Billie Rinaldi" <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 3:02:41 PM > >> Subject: Re: Hadoop 2.0 Support for Accumulo 1.4 Branch On Fri, Jul > >> 26, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Joey Echeverria <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > If these patches are going to be included with 1.4.4 or 1.4.5, I > >>> > would > >>> like > >>> > to see the following test run using CDH4 on at least a 5 node cluster. > >>> > More nodes would be better. > >>> > > >>> > * unit test > >>> > * Functional test > >>> > * 24 hr Continuous ingest + verification > >>> > * 24 hr Continuous ingest + verification + agitation > >>> > * 24 hr Random walk > >>> > * 24 hr Random walk + agitation > >>> > > >>> > I may be able to assist with this, but I can not make any promises. > >>> > >>> Sure thing. Is there already a write-up on running this full battery > >>> of tests? I have a 10 node cluster that I can use for this. > >>> > >>> > >>> > Great. I think this would be a good patch for 1.4. I assume that > >>> > if a user stays with Hadoop 1 there are no dependency changes? > >>> > >>> Yup. It works the same way as 1.5 where all of the dependency changes > >>> are in a Hadoop 2.0 profile. > >>> > >> In 1.5.0, we gave up on compatibility with 0.20 (and early versions of > >> 1.0) to make the compatibility requirements simpler; we ended up > >> without dependency changes in the hadoop version profiles. Will 1.4 > >> still work with 0.20 with these patches? If there are dependency > >> changes in the profiles, 1.4 would have to be compiled against a > >> hadoop version compatible with the running version of hadoop, correct? > >> We had some trouble in the > >> 1.5 release process with figuring out how to provide multiple binary > >> artifacts (each compiled against a different version of hadoop) for > >> the same release. Just something we should consider before we are in > >> the midst of releasing 1.4.4. > >> Billie > >>> -Joey > >>> > > > > > > -- > Joey Echeverria > Director, Federal FTS > Cloudera, Inc.
