> On Nov. 6, 2013, 8 p.m., John Vines wrote:
> > Ship It!
> 
> John Vines wrote:
>     Grr, misclicked and I don't seem to be able to delete it...

Seriously hating review board, ate the rest of my comment.

My issues are Busbey's issues. I don't think the thread safe ones are that high 
priority, but that's a nice to have.


- John


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15279/#review28296
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 6, 2013, 7:02 p.m., Bill Havanki wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/15279/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 6, 2013, 7:02 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for accumulo.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ACCUMULO-1556
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1556
> 
> 
> Repository: accumulo
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The Initialize class now generates clearer error messages if an initialized 
> instance is discovered. The messages vary depending on whether 
> instance.dfs.uri is used.
> 
> Note that to facilitate unit testing, the verification logic in 
> Initialize.doInit() was refactored into a checkInit() method.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   pom.xml 9ed2fdf1c7a1f8831667b27bfaa307fbe2467fe8 
>   src/server/pom.xml 6421bc69cda5116f9716d30adc3d510baa3bb7d6 
>   src/server/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/util/Initialize.java 
> 51576fcc8ff8ffcd65a78bfeaaaf51036360a6bc 
>   
> src/server/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/util/InitializeTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15279/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran initialization with patch changes on 1.4.3 cluster under CDH 4.3. Tested 
> successful initialization and correct emission of error messages when 
> instance.dfs.uri was used and was not used. Also, implemented unit tests for 
> altered code.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Havanki
> 
>

Reply via email to