On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote:
> The main thing is that I would not want to see an ACCUMULO-1790 > *without* ACCUMULO-1795. Having 1792 alone would be insufficient for > me. > > That is precisely the intention of ACCUMULO-1790. All of the subtasks (including ACCUMULO-1792 and ACCUMULO-1795) have to be complete for things to get into the 1.4 branch. Until that time the work would just go into a feature branch for ACCUMULO-1790 (to make working and testing easier for those implementing the subtasks). If you wanted to see the full implementation you would just wait until all of the subtasks were committed to the feature branch. Am I missing something? -- Sean
