Nope, I think we're on the same page now. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The main thing is that I would not want to see an ACCUMULO-1790 >> *without* ACCUMULO-1795. Having 1792 alone would be insufficient for >> me. >> >> > That is precisely the intention of ACCUMULO-1790. All of the subtasks > (including ACCUMULO-1792 and ACCUMULO-1795) have to be complete for things > to get into the 1.4 branch. Until that time the work would just go into a > feature branch for ACCUMULO-1790 (to make working and testing easier for > those implementing the subtasks). If you wanted to see the full > implementation you would just wait until all of the subtasks were committed > to the feature branch. > > Am I missing something? > > > -- > Sean
