> On Dec. 12, 2013, 4:40 p.m., Eric Newton wrote:
> > src/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/data/Key.java, line 295
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/16224/diff/1/?file=397000#file397000line295>
> >
> >     Check out o.a.a.c.u.ArgumentChecker for null value checks.

Ugh, the checks are nice but their exception messages aren't customizable, 
e.g., "argument 'row' was null". I could enhance ArgumentChecker, if you think 
it's important enough to do that in this ticket.


- Bill


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16224/#review30279
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 12, 2013, 4:32 p.m., Bill Havanki wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/16224/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 12, 2013, 4:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for accumulo.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ACCUMULO-1986
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1986
> 
> 
> Repository: accumulo
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Integrity checks for constructing Key and Mutation objects from Thrift.
> 
> To make adding unit tests easier, I updated KeyTest and MutationTest to use 
> JUnit 4 annotations. That drove the need to rename an assertEquals method in 
> MutationTest, hence all the changes to "checkCU" there.
> 
> See the JIRA ticket for a list of classes that I evaluated for these same 
> sort of integrity checks.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/data/Key.java cfb0b5c 
>   src/core/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/data/Mutation.java 3979da9 
>   src/core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/data/KeyTest.java 9a7f0d7 
>   src/core/src/test/java/org/apache/accumulo/core/data/MutationTest.java 
> 38ddcad 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16224/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit tests and functional tests pass.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bill Havanki
> 
>

Reply via email to