----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15947/#review30972 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Ship It! - Sean Busbey On Dec. 16, 2013, 4:32 p.m., Bill Havanki wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/15947/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 16, 2013, 4:32 p.m.) > > > Review request for accumulo. > > > Bugs: ACCUMULO-1944 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1944 > > > Repository: accumulo > > > Description > ------- > > The -C flag for test/system/auto/run.py did not work. This changeset allows > it to work again if a functional Cobertura installation is placed under > $ACCUMULO_HOME/lib/test/cobertura. > > The code for producing instrumented Accumulo code was inactive and out of > date. It was reworked so that, if -C is passed, the Accumulo JARs are > instrumented and placed into a location ahead of their standard location in > the test classpath. (If -C is not passed, any instrumented JARs are removed.) > The classpath is also dynamically adjusted to include whatever Cobertura JAR > is available; its name includes a version number (as of 2.0.x). > > The command-line scripts shipped with Cobertura 2.0.x are out of date and do > not work out of the box. Pull request #102 was submitted to > cobertura/cobertura on Github to fix the problem; in lieu of that, the > scripts must be manually updated to use a correct classpath. > > > Diffs > ----- > > test/system/auto/TestUtils.py f6eca67 > test/system/auto/run.py 8e1a9bb > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15947/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Ran simple and stress functional tests on 1.4.5-SNAPSHOT, both with and > without -C. Verified that coverage reports are generated. > > > Thanks, > > Bill Havanki > >
