I agree with Chief Keith. Clarity in the docs would be good.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Keith Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the intention is 1 24h w/ agitation AND 1 24h w/o agitation > > > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Our release guide[1] has some lines that I'd like to clarify. > > > > > > 1. Two 24-hour periods of the randomwalk LongClean test with and > without > > agitation need to be run successfully. > > 2. Two 24-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without agitation > > need to be validated successfully. > > 3. Two 72-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without > agitation. > > No validation is necessary but the cluster should be checked to ensure > > it > > is still functional. > > > > Is the intention on each of these lines to have 4 total test periods? > > > > That is does number 1, for example, mean I need > > > > Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation > > Period 2: 24 hr LongClean with agitation > > Period 3: 24 hr LongClean without agitation > > Period 4: 24 hr LongClean without agitation > > > > Or is the intention for number 1 to mean: > > > > Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation > > Period 2: 24 hr LongClean without agitation > > > > Presuming we quickly have consensus, does anyone feel I'd need a [VOTE] > > thread to rewrite the section to match, or would the [DISCUSS] thread be > > sufficient? > > > > > > -Sean > > > > [1]: http://accumulo.apache.org/governance/releasing.html#cluster-based > > >
