We have gone with option #2 in the past.
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > (repeating from IRC) this was also my interpretation. > > > On 3/21/14, 1:03 PM, Keith Turner wrote: > >> I think the intention is 1 24h w/ agitation AND 1 24h w/o agitation >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Hi! >>> >>> Our release guide[1] has some lines that I'd like to clarify. >>> >>> >>> 1. Two 24-hour periods of the randomwalk LongClean test with and >>> without >>> agitation need to be run successfully. >>> 2. Two 24-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without >>> agitation >>> need to be validated successfully. >>> 3. Two 72-hour periods of continuous ingest with and without >>> agitation. >>> No validation is necessary but the cluster should be checked to >>> ensure >>> it >>> is still functional. >>> >>> Is the intention on each of these lines to have 4 total test periods? >>> >>> That is does number 1, for example, mean I need >>> >>> Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation >>> Period 2: 24 hr LongClean with agitation >>> Period 3: 24 hr LongClean without agitation >>> Period 4: 24 hr LongClean without agitation >>> >>> Or is the intention for number 1 to mean: >>> >>> Period 1: 24 hr LongClean with agitation >>> Period 2: 24 hr LongClean without agitation >>> >>> Presuming we quickly have consensus, does anyone feel I'd need a [VOTE] >>> thread to rewrite the section to match, or would the [DISCUSS] thread be >>> sufficient? >>> >>> >>> -Sean >>> >>> [1]: http://accumulo.apache.org/governance/releasing.html#cluster-based >>> >>> >>
