Ok, I'll fix it. Should have read this before https://projects.apache.org/guidelines.html
Just pushed with the https, not sure how long the current project doap info is cached, but it doesn't seem to have updated yet. Not sure if there is something else I need to do. Thanks On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Drew Farris <[email protected]> wrote: > Billie has it right - I missed this - I also believe it should be http, not > https for the rdf categories. > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM Billie Rinaldi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I spot-checked four of the projects listed in the database category, and > > they all used http rather than https. Did you see any examples that used > > https? Since our category is already broken, I'd be okay with pushing to > > see if it works, and if it doesn't then we could revert 0554092; or we > > could just revert that now to match the other projects. In any case, +1 > > for 3154c1d. > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael Wall <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I noticed our category was not parsing correctly at > > > > > > https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category > > > > > > Search Accumulo. > > > > > > I updated it in the gh-pages branch with > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/commit/3154c1dc1386850aa9bdcee27b71045bad01623b > > > and > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/commit/0554092a5fe2b69bee0071130e69e9f42fa5ecde > > > > > > Can someone else review this before I push to the asf-site branch? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Mike > > > > > >
