No problem Christopher. Thanks for making it so easy to update the site. Looks like the reindex happened and Accumulo is now showing up first in the database category
https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category#database On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for fixing that, Mike. I had thought that change might be a bit > risky, as it's not clear to me the relationship between the content of > category field in the DOAP and the people.apache.org website which no > longer has categories at that location. It seems that the behavior is > reliant on the old URLs before the people site got redirected to > home.apache.org. > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:44 AM Billie Rinaldi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Sounds good. Thanks, Mike! > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Michael Wall <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Category link back to http. Our doap appears correct at > > > http://accumulo.apache.org/doap_Accumulo.rdf. It is at least valid > RDF, > > > > > > > > > http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/rdfval?URI=http%3A%2F%2Faccumulo.apache.org%2Fdoap_Accumulo.rdf&PARSE=Parse+URI%3A+&TRIPLES_AND_GRAPH=PRINT_TRIPLES&FORMAT=PNG_EMBED > > > > > > Seems like there is a cronjob to update the project data stored at > > > https://projects.apache.org/json/projects/accumulo.json. If the crons > > are > > > setup as shown in this file > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/projects.apache.org/STRUCTURE.txt?view=markup#l55 > > > , > > > the project data will be updated tonight. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Drew Farris <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > It is unfortunate that the category list (linked from the doap > > guidelines > > > > is 404: > > > > https://projects.apache.org/categories.html > > > > > > > > There's also this - not sure if anyone's tried it. > > > > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-doap-plugin/ > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:23 AM Michael Wall <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ok, I'll fix it. Should have read this before > > > > > https://projects.apache.org/guidelines.html > > > > > > > > > > Just pushed with the https, not sure how long the current project > > doap > > > > info > > > > > is cached, but it doesn't seem to have updated yet. Not sure if > > there > > > is > > > > > something else I need to do. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:17 AM, Drew Farris <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Billie has it right - I missed this - I also believe it should be > > > http, > > > > > not > > > > > > https for the rdf categories. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM Billie Rinaldi < > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > I spot-checked four of the projects listed in the database > > > category, > > > > > and > > > > > > > they all used http rather than https. Did you see any examples > > > that > > > > > used > > > > > > > https? Since our category is already broken, I'd be okay with > > > > pushing > > > > > to > > > > > > > see if it works, and if it doesn't then we could revert > 0554092; > > or > > > > we > > > > > > > could just revert that now to match the other projects. In any > > > case, > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > for 3154c1d. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:24 AM, Michael Wall < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I noticed our category was not parsing correctly at > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://projects.apache.org/projects.html?category > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Search Accumulo. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I updated it in the gh-pages branch with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/commit/3154c1dc1386850aa9bdcee27b71045bad01623b > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/accumulo/commit/0554092a5fe2b69bee0071130e69e9f42fa5ecde > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can someone else review this before I push to the asf-site > > > branch? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
