Please just let people vote, Christopher. We don't need to have the
continued chatter on every vote being cast...
Christopher wrote:
That was previously proposed and discussed, and the argument against it was
that it would either increase our support burden or we'd have to
prematurely EOL 1.7.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016, 10:51 ivan bella<[email protected]> wrote:
If 1.8 and 2.0 are so close, then just release both back to back. I am
perfectly willing to step up and help testing if that is such a burden on
the community.
I give a -1 (non-binding) vote in this regard.
On August 23, 2016 at 10:21 AM "Marc P."<[email protected]> wrote:
Correct to -1 ( non-binding ). In spirit of Dave's response I'll leave it
that my opinion was swayed following the discussion.
I'll also readily admit that perhaps I hadn't fully digested the
arguments
previously but this thread helped cement my opinion.
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Sean Busbey<[email protected]>
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Marc P.<[email protected]>
wrote:
I think there is value in commenting because after Reading the
responses
last night I was swayed to -1. Perhaps others might be as well.
Sorry Marc, just for clarification are you changing your +1 vote to -1?
I ask because I didn't see an email prior to this one that did that.
--
busbey
