-1 (binding) on this - Lets move ahead with getting the current set of new features packaged into a Java 7 compatible 1.8.0 release and clearly declare our goal to move exclusively Java 8 in the next major release. New features can be implemented with Java 8 specifics soonest because we've nailed down a 1.8 baseline
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:37 PM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > Please just let people vote, Christopher. We don't need to have the > continued chatter on every vote being cast... > > Christopher wrote: > > That was previously proposed and discussed, and the argument against it > was > > that it would either increase our support burden or we'd have to > > prematurely EOL 1.7. > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016, 10:51 ivan bella<[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> If 1.8 and 2.0 are so close, then just release both back to back. I am > >> perfectly willing to step up and help testing if that is such a burden > on > >> the community. > >> > >> I give a -1 (non-binding) vote in this regard. > >> > >> > >>> On August 23, 2016 at 10:21 AM "Marc P."<[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Correct to -1 ( non-binding ). In spirit of Dave's response I'll leave > it > >>> that my opinion was swayed following the discussion. > >>> > >>> I'll also readily admit that perhaps I hadn't fully digested the > >> arguments > >>> previously but this thread helped cement my opinion. > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Sean Busbey<[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Marc P.<[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>> I think there is value in commenting because after Reading the > >> responses > >>>>> last night I was swayed to -1. Perhaps others might be as well. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Sorry Marc, just for clarification are you changing your +1 vote to > -1? > >>>> > >>>> I ask because I didn't see an email prior to this one that did that. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> busbey > >>>> > > >
