> I've always disliked the 'multicast' in the DSL; its kinda ugly. I
> wonder would using the word 'wireTap' be better?
Looking at it from the Spring pov, this would mean
<route>
<from uri="seda:a"/>
<wireTap>
<to uri="seda:tap"/>
<to uri="seda:b"/>
</wireTap>
</route>
which I think is a good change -- give us an id attribute
on the wireTap element and that would be cool ;)
Here's another suggestion - if you describe a little route
like:
<route>
<from uri="seda:a"/>
<to uri="seda:tap"/>
<to uri="seda:b"/>
</route>
then that acts as a pipeline - which is the same as
<route>
<from uri="seda:a"/>
<pipeline>
<to uri="seda:tap"/>
<to uri="seda:b"/>
</pipeline>
</route>
d'you think that we could *not* have the two of them,
for the sake of consistency?
--oh
