-1 for wiretap For me wireTap is still as if only you could tab the wire once, eg only add one extra endpoint, where as multicast I would know I can add more endpoints. Also the wiretap is categorized as a System Management pattern. Not the category I would at first for such a need.
+1 for recipentList I do think we should support the existing <recipientList> to handle both dynamic and static lists of endpoints. Med venlig hilsen Claus Ibsen ...................................... Silverbullet Skovsgårdsvænget 21 8362 Hørning Tlf. +45 2962 7576 Web: www.silverbullet.dk -----Original Message----- From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9. oktober 2008 19:26 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Camel 2.0] thought for the day: rename multicast() to be wireTap()? WireTap or Recipients as in a static recipient list pattern ? On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 5:54 PM, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've always disliked the 'multicast' in the DSL; its kinda ugly. I > wonder would using the word 'wireTap' be better? As its kinda a > wiretap - send the same message exchange to multiple places? > > Thoughts? > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://open.iona.com > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://open.iona.com
