I perfer to use camel-1.x , since we could release camel 1.5.x or camel 1.6 from this branch. If we don't want to release camel 1.6 or camel 1.7, we could use camel-1.5 as the branch name.
Just my two cents. Willem/ On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Jonathan Anstey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now that the 1.5 release is pretty much complete I'm thinking of setting up > a branch so we can start hacking on 2.0 stuff more freely. I guess there are > several options on names > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/camel/branches/camel-1.5 > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/camel/branches/camel-1.5.x > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/camel/branches/camel-1.x > > I prefer camel-1.5 since it follows ActiveMQ's branching convention - does > anybody else have a preference? > > I'm also going to set up http://www.orcaware.com/svn/wiki/Svnmerge.py on > that branch so we can have nice merge tracking between trunk and the branch. > > Cheers, > Jon >
