Am liking 1.x for the same reasons as Willem now :) 2008/10/29 Willem Jiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I perfer to use camel-1.x , since we could release camel 1.5.x or camel 1.6 > from this branch. > If we don't want to release camel 1.6 or camel 1.7, we could use camel-1.5 > as the branch name. > > Just my two cents. > > Willem/ > > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:47 PM, Jonathan Anstey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Now that the 1.5 release is pretty much complete I'm thinking of setting up >> a branch so we can start hacking on 2.0 stuff more freely. I guess there are >> several options on names >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/camel/branches/camel-1.5 >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/camel/branches/camel-1.5.x >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/camel/branches/camel-1.x >> >> I prefer camel-1.5 since it follows ActiveMQ's branching convention - does >> anybody else have a preference? >> >> I'm also going to set up http://www.orcaware.com/svn/wiki/Svnmerge.py on >> that branch so we can have nice merge tracking between trunk and the branch. >> >> Cheers, >> Jon >> >
-- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
