+1 to simplifying/minimising the default config. 2009/5/27 Aleksi Kallio <aleksi.kal...@csc.fi>
> > Hi, > > Thanks for your replies! I would also support making the default > configuration production ready and simple. In my opinion, it is better to > have the examples in Wiki or similar, instead of the default configuration. > > -Aleksi > > > rajdavies wrote: > > > > Hi Aleksi, > > > > creating lots of temporary topics is definately ok. > > +1 to change useDedicatedTaskRunner back to false > > > > cheers, > > > > Rob > > > > Rob Davies > > http://fusesource.com > > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ > > > > On 26 May 2009, at 14:38, Aleksi Kallio wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> Aleksi Kallio wrote: > >>> > >>> Because of the excessive thread creation, using dedicated > >>> TaskRunners was > >>> also slower. If they are preferred, shouldn't temporary topics (and > >>> queues) be handled in a more lighweight manner? > >>> > >> > >> My question did not arouse much interest, so I'll have a second go: Is > >> creating a lot of temporary topics (resulting in a lots of threads > >> at the > >> broker) against the general design philosophy of JMS or ActiveMQ? In > >> other > >> words, are we doing something stupid or is it just that the default > >> value of > >> UseDedicatedTaskRunner is a bit counterintuitive? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Aleksi > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> > http://www.nabble.com/Why-UseDedicatedTaskRunner-is-true-by-default--tp23631976p23723071.html > >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > > > > > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Why-UseDedicatedTaskRunner-is-true-by-default--tp23631976p23738535.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- http://blog.garytully.com Open Source SOA http://FUSESource.com
