+1 for both
Thanks,
Aaron
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Hiram Chirino <chir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:54 AM, Gary Tully <gary.tu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 to simplifying/minimising the default config.
>>
>> 2009/5/27 Aleksi Kallio <aleksi.kal...@csc.fi>
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your replies! I would also support making the default
>>> configuration production ready and simple. In my opinion, it is better to
>>> have the examples in Wiki or similar, instead of the default configuration.
>>>
>>> -Aleksi
>>>
>>>
>>> rajdavies wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Aleksi,
>>> >
>>> > creating lots of temporary topics is definately ok.
>>> > +1 to change useDedicatedTaskRunner back to false
>>> >
>>> > cheers,
>>> >
>>> > Rob
>>> >
>>> > Rob Davies
>>> > http://fusesource.com
>>> > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
>>> >
>>> > On 26 May 2009, at 14:38, Aleksi Kallio wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Aleksi Kallio wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Because of the excessive thread creation, using dedicated
>>> >>> TaskRunners was
>>> >>> also slower. If they are preferred, shouldn't temporary topics (and
>>> >>> queues) be handled in a more lighweight manner?
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> My question did not arouse much interest, so I'll have a second go: Is
>>> >> creating a lot of temporary topics (resulting in a lots of threads
>>> >> at the
>>> >> broker) against the general design philosophy of JMS or ActiveMQ? In
>>> >> other
>>> >> words, are we doing something stupid or is it just that the default
>>> >> value of
>>> >> UseDedicatedTaskRunner is a bit counterintuitive?
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Aleksi
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> View this message in context:
>>> >>
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Why-UseDedicatedTaskRunner-is-true-by-default--tp23631976p23723071.html
>>> >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>> --
>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://www.nabble.com/Why-UseDedicatedTaskRunner-is-true-by-default--tp23631976p23738535.html
>>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://blog.garytully.com
>>
>> Open Source SOA
>> http://FUSESource.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> Open Source SOA
> http://fusesource.com/
>
>
