We have been using Oracle without issue with activemq 5.1, so prevoius
versions worked with Oracle. We can try creating our own
OracleDatabaseLocker if needed.
I found setDatabaseLocker() on JDBCPersistenceAdapter, so in the custom
spring dialect, can I say something like
<persistenceAdapter>
<jdbcPersistenceAdapter dataSource="#mydatasource"
databaseLocker="#mydblocker" />
</persistenceAdapter>
and then define mydblocker via regular spring config?
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> thanks for the heads up. It looks like it is time to have more than one
> database locker implementation in the box.
> A database locker implementation can be injected into the persistence
> adapter via config if that helps in the short term. Can you validate that
> Oracle works fine without the getMetaData call?
>
> I have reopened AMQ-1191, thanks.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-1191-for-5.3-broke-master-slave-locking-for-Oracle-tp24648059p24649622.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
