yea, exactly like that, where bean id="mydblocker" is an instance of your OracleDatabaseLocker.
2009/7/24 bwtaylor <[email protected]> > > We have been using Oracle without issue with activemq 5.1, so prevoius > versions worked with Oracle. We can try creating our own > OracleDatabaseLocker if needed. > > I found setDatabaseLocker() on JDBCPersistenceAdapter, so in the custom > spring dialect, can I say something like > > <persistenceAdapter> > <jdbcPersistenceAdapter dataSource="#mydatasource" > databaseLocker="#mydblocker" /> > </persistenceAdapter> > > and then define mydblocker via regular spring config? > > > Gary Tully wrote: > > > > thanks for the heads up. It looks like it is time to have more than one > > database locker implementation in the box. > > A database locker implementation can be injected into the persistence > > adapter via config if that helps in the short term. Can you validate that > > Oracle works fine without the getMetaData call? > > > > I have reopened AMQ-1191, thanks. > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-1191-for-5.3-broke-master-slave-locking-for-Oracle-tp24648059p24649622.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- http://blog.garytully.com Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com
