[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13254192#comment-13254192
]
Timothy Bish commented on AMQ-3802:
-----------------------------------
I added an addition to testDurableUnsub in StompTest.java to show that when the
unsubscribe is sent with the correct headers it works as expected. The above
stomp code doesn't set the 'activemq.subscriptionName' on the unsubscribe so it
won't actually unsub anything.
> Successful unsubscribing should not report inactive durable topic subscribers
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-3802
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3802
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 5.5.1
> Environment: Solaris,Linux
> Reporter: Bhanu
>
> An unsubscribe call should remove the client from inactive durable topic
> subscribers list. In the current broker behavior, even if a durable consumer
> unsubscribes & shuts down gracefully, the broker marks the durable subscriber
> as inactive. If this durable subscriber was never meant to come up again(as
> in my case where i am testing rigorously using unique client-ids each time
> based on pid) then broker will unnecessarily mark a lot of consumers as
> inactive durable.
> For inactive durable subscribers, there is no distinction between a
> subscriber going down abruptly or unsubscribing & going down gracefully.
> This should be improved I think. Moreover, any tips on how to remove those
> 1000s of inactive subscriptions dangling in my Jconsole ?? Destroying each
> manually isn't an option !
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
