[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13254588#comment-13254588
]
Buchi Reddy B commented on AMQ-3802:
------------------------------------
@Timothy I have actually tried to unsubscribe with 'activemq.subscriptionName'
also but that doesn't work. Did you try to test with the above Perl code
instead of using Java Stomp Client?
> Successful unsubscribing should not report inactive durable topic subscribers
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-3802
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3802
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 5.5.1
> Environment: Solaris,Linux
> Reporter: Bhanu
>
> An unsubscribe call should remove the client from inactive durable topic
> subscribers list. In the current broker behavior, even if a durable consumer
> unsubscribes & shuts down gracefully, the broker marks the durable subscriber
> as inactive. If this durable subscriber was never meant to come up again(as
> in my case where i am testing rigorously using unique client-ids each time
> based on pid) then broker will unnecessarily mark a lot of consumers as
> inactive durable.
> For inactive durable subscribers, there is no distinction between a
> subscriber going down abruptly or unsubscribing & going down gracefully.
> This should be improved I think. Moreover, any tips on how to remove those
> 1000s of inactive subscriptions dangling in my Jconsole ?? Destroying each
> manually isn't an option !
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
