What is the expectation for queue size and performance when using prioritization?
On a queue that has prioritization enabled, if you have more than 60,000 messages, performance **plummets** -- approximately 10ms per each additional 1000 messages (timed on a modern Windows server). I find that odd, given that prioritization could be (mostly?) handled on queue-write, not read. Is this expected, or a bug? Sean -- View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Queue-prioritization-tp4658991.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
